A leading company oriented to virtual transformation.
WASHINGTON (AP) – Hundreds of lawsuits have been filed before the November election. The cases relate to the basic principles of the voting process in the United States, how ballots are issued and counted. Here’s a look at some of the primary trials in the battlefield states. :
NORTH CAROLINA: The Crusade of Trump and the Republican National Committee are suing in federal court to prevent state election officials from implementing adjustments to rules that can simply increase the number of ballots counted. force the voter to fill out a new blank ballot.
PENNSYLVANIA (AP) – Republican lawmakers asked the U. S. Supreme Court to suspend a ruling that extends the time it takes to count and obtain ballots by mail. won through county election forums before five o’clock on the afternoon of November 6. A separate federal lawsuit through the Trump Crusade and the RNC seeks to ban the deposit boxes or other collection sites that some counties used in the June primary.
ARIZONA: A federal ruling issued a ruling in favor of Democrats, arguing that the electorate did not point to their early ballots before mailing them up to five days after the election to resolve the issue. It is not fair that election officials do not give the electorate the chance to “cure” the problem. Since then, the case has been appealed to the U. S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
WISCONSIN: A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld a six-day extension to count absentee ballots in Wisconsin as long as they are erased on or before Election Day. appealed to the U. S. Supreme Court. In neighboring Michigan, the Republican Party is suing to overturn a resolution that allows the state to count absentee votes up to 14 days after the election.
OHIO: Democrats sued the leader of the state election to force the expansion of electoral ballot boxes in all 88 counties of the state. County Election Forums exclusive deposit boxes at each of the council locations as an option to mail a survey by mail. issue a federal judgement on the adjustments rejected to the signature requirement for voting and voting requests.