The top popular trend right now is to dispense with skins. Versace, Michael Kors and Gucci recently took the resolution to avoid skins and have joined other notable brands, joining Tommy Hilfiger, Stella McCartney and Giorgio Armani. And on Tuesday, some other favorite fashion, fate joined us – Nordstrom.
The recent replacement of so many leaders in the area of luxury fashion marks a significant and firm commitment of luxury brands to animal rights, but the anti-skin movement is developing well beyond the list of individual brands that made the replacement, thanks to the British. Fashion Council’s resolve to ban animal skins at all London Fashion Week fashion shows The resolution, made in 2018, marked the CFB as the first leading fashion council to completely ban animal skins.
“Today, the British Fashion Council (BFC) announces that after a survey of all London Fashion Week designers on the official catwalk and presentation schedule, animal skins will not be used at London Fashion Week in September 2018,” the council announced in a press. . adding that they continue to inspire designers “to make possible moral choices about their variety and chain of origin.
However, the motion is also increasingly adapting to the United States. Last year, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors banned the sale of new skin parts, making it the largest city to do so. he said the ban on the sale of furs marked a “historic victory” in the fight against the slaughter of fur animals. The law entered into force on January 1, 2019 and will allow stores to see their existing stock until January 2020.
Next, we gathered all the luxury brands that oppose the use of furs and what prompted them to take a position.
By the end of 2021, the national branch will avoid promoting animal skins or exotic animal skin products, the corporation announced on September 29.
“As a leading fashion retailer, we are committed to providing the most productive service and products imaginable to our visitors. Fulfilling this commitment means constantly listening to visitor feedback and developing our product offering to make sure we meet your needs,” Teri Bariquit said. Director of merchandising at Nordstrom, in a press release.
“As a component of the continued evolution of our products, we collaborated with the U. S. Animal Protective Society and have recently taken the decision to avoid providing genuine skin or exotic animal skin products at one of our outlets or online. Label brands haven’t used those fabrics for years, so extending this policy to all the brands we offer is the next herbal step for our company. “
Nordstrom is also committed to prioritizing the environment in other ways. By 2025, the company’s goals come with a $250,000 contribution in commercial subsidies to slow down and prevent climate change, which 15% of its collection is classified as sustainable, reducing single-use plastic. up to 50% or more.
The Italian fashion space Prada Group has announced that all its brands, which come with Prada, Miu Miu, Church’s and Car Shoe, will stop using animal skins in their creations or products. Collections.
“The Prada Group is committed to innovation and social responsibility, and our skin-free policy, achieved as a result of a positive discussion with fur free alliance, especially with LAV and the Humane Society of the United States, is an extension of this commitment,” designer Miuccia Prada said in a statement. “Focusing on cutting-edge fabrics will allow the company to explore new boundaries of artistic design while creating the call for moral products. “
Since Humane Society International, Humane Society of the United States and Fur Free Alliance presented a public crusade urging the logo to give up skins last September, they have been working with Prada to implement the changes.
The logo announced that it would avoid fox, mink, angora, rabbit and Asian raccoon skins, starting with Tisci’s first collection. The designer, who joined Burberry as artistic director in March, marked the replacement as a “new era” on Instagram.
“We’re making a commitment to this,” Burberry CEO Marco Gobbetti told Business of Fashion. It’s a component of our artistic thinking. That clarifies our position.
“Skins? I’m offside. I don’t need to kill animals to make fashion. That doesn’t sound right to me,” Donatella told The Economist mag 1843. The publication noted that there were still leather products on the market. the time of the story’s publication (and you can still find a skin pillow right now).
And, of course, PETA praises this decision. ” PETA led track interruptions, protests and an exhibition bombardment in 2006 at a time when Versace was synonymous with furs, so this news is welcome,” PETA Senior Vice President Dan Mathews said in a speech on Versace’s change. “Donatella’s understanding that it’s wrong to squeal and electrocute animals by the skin is a major turning point in the crusade for compassionate fashion, and PETA is eager to see a leatherless Versace afterwards. “
In late 2017, Gucci announced that it would stop making furs, which is unexpected given that one of its most popular shoes is a leather-lined loath.
“Do you think the use of furs today is still fashionable?I don’t think it’s still fashionable and that’s why we don’t. It’s a little outdated,” CEO and President Marco Bizzarri told BoF. “Creativity can skip many other instructions instead of using furs. “
Creative director Alessandro Michele agreed: “Fashion has focused on trends and feelings and awaits consumer desires and desires,” he told BoF.
In late 2017, Michael Kors announced that until late December 2018, all leather models will be removed from Michael Kors and Jimmy Choo (which he acquired last year). “Due to technological advances in manufacturing, we now have the ability to create a luxury aesthetic using non-animal skins,” designer Michael Kors said at a reception through BoF.
“This resolution marks a new bankruptcy as our company continues to evolve in the use of cutting-edge materials,” added Michael Kors President and CEO John D. Idol.
The move came after Kors saw protests through PETA and animal rights activists throughout 2017 to protest the use of fur. He was ambushed at the level at a convention and PETA activists invaded his SoHo store to protest.
RELATED: Meet the celebrities who posed nude for PETA’s anti-skin campaigns
Gorigio Armani took the decision to avoid having skins in 2016.
“I am pleased to announce that Armani Group is firmly committed to abolishing the use of animal skins in its collections,” Armani said at the time. “Technological advances over the years allow us to have valuable opportunities at our disposal that make the use of ruthless practices against unnecessary animals. Continuing the positive procedure that began a long time ago, my corporate is now taking a big step forward, reflecting our attention to critical issues of coverage and environmental and animal care.
The day Gianni Versace died: why did a serial killer target the outdoor fashion icon at his Miami mansion?
Although he is careful to call his logo “hairless”, Ford has visibly omitted the hair from his fall 2018 collection after recently adopting a vegan lifestyle.
“I’ve been vegan for about a year,” he told WWD. “When you look at how our meats, our animal products, are raised to the fullest, from a fitness point of view, I thought I wouldn’t eat those things anymore. “
He told the online page that he began to consult the use of furs in his collections when he became vegan. “I started simulating a lot more skins. I’m not in a position to say I don’t have hair yet. Now, however, I have limited fur in those collections and I’m going to use food by-products, which don’t seem very sexy. “I’m promoting you a food by-product!” This means cowhide, sheepskin turned upwards, means not making skins that are raised only by their skin.
Since the logo was launched in 2001, she has never used genuine skins. Instead, he created “Fur-Free-Fur”, which incorporates the appearance and feel of the skin into the designs, but without any cruelty to the animals. a “Skinless Skin” label on the outside of the clothing to announce the components of the curtains).
In 2016, McCartney told Broadly, “I think the fashion industry can get away with it and get away with it. Skin is the ultimate in the world. These animals are not eaten, if they try to pretend that the products of the fur industry are by-products, they are not. These animals are bred to be converted into coats”.
Those who have opposed the logo by even designing imitation leather pieces, the logo writes on it that “we have come to the conclusion that by providing a luxury skinless product that is such a smart choice for genuine skins, we do not display animals. harmed by fashion and that’s a vital message for us.
According PETA. org, Westwood stopped skins in 2007 after meeting with the animal rights organization and learning about the suffering of animals raised and trapped by furs.
Tommy Hilfiger and Polo Ralph Lauren hairless in 2007.
One of the first advocates of the cause is Calvin Klein, who stopped using fur models in 1994!According to the New York Times, he made his resolution based on “my own mind about the human remedy of animals” and “the fact that our company’s fur segment no longer adapts to our business philosophy. “