In mid-September 2020, disobeying Twitter regulations prohibiting deceptive media, U. S. President Donald Trump shared a forged video with Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden twice in 24 hours. can tarnish public perception.
A camera captured the former vice president betting Luis Fonsi’s 2017 Latin pop song, “Despacito”, from a mobile phone, smiling and jumping head-on a podium on a crusade in Kissimmee, Florida, on September 15, through C-SPAN video testing. The artist was present and also spoke on the occasion.
But the edited edition of the video shared through Trump replaced the pop song with N. W. A. ‘s 1988 “Fuck Tha Police” to show Biden as anti-cop. “What is all this?” Trump tweeted with the fake video.
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 16, 2020
Trump’s intentions or his crusade were unclear; It is also unknown whether the president knew that the video had been manipulated before or after sharing it, and whether the crusade was intended to deceive the audience that he could interpret the photographs as real.
Without context, however, Trump’s tweets and subtitles discussed above, adding: “China drools. They can’t!” – We contacted the crusade on September 16th. The interview request showed the president’s tweets, adding fake images, as well as the original video clip in which Biden played “Despacito”, with the following questions:
The crusade has still answered us. We will update this report when or if that is the case.
A media organization called “The United Spot” originally released the fake video with the anthem against the police. The organization’s YouTube account, which has about 136,000 followers, says that “all videos are one hundred percent paradic/satirical” and its purpose is “to make you laugh. “
– The United Spot (TheUnitedSpot1) September 16, 2020
Many media outlets have reported Trump’s tweets sharing the fake video, which Twitter eventually called a “manipulated medium” for the audience to discern the facts of fiction. Fox News has described the president’s messages as “trolling” his opponent, or as a planned attempt to provoke online combat by exchanging provocative content.
At least one of the president’s allies, Jack Posobiec, celebrated the reactions of newscasts and others to tweets with manipulated videos, describing them as a strategic effort through the president to draw attention not only to a “embarrassed” moment for Biden. campaign, but also its “spectacular failure to help law enforcement. “(Note: Trump has continually claimed biden sided with left-wing progressives pushing to “de-finance the police,” Biden has said he opposes the concept. )
– Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 18, 2020
Posobiec, who has been a leader in high-level disinformation campaigns for years, wrote on The Post Millennial, a conservative Canadian website:
By now, it’s unexpected that Twitter and the media haven’t perceived Trump’s meme game, whenever he needs to magnify a message, just post an effective meme and the media will make the pictures for him.
– ???? Is silence gold???????? (@Silent_Kindling) September 16, 2020
In accordance with Twitter’s policies, site directors would likely place the tag on tweets that have been misleadingly edited or fabricated, or shared in a misleading manner. Meanwhile, content that site controllers may also simply “affect public protection or cause serious harm” would possibly be removed. The policy read:
We are more likely to take action (tagging or removal) . . . on a larger manipulation bureaucracy, such as completely artificial audio or video or content that has been manipulated (spliced and rearranged, slowed down) to replace its meaning. [. . . ]
We also read about whether the context in which the media is shared can lead to confusion or a false impression or recommend a planned goal to deceive others about the nature or origin of the content, for example by falsely stating that it represents reality.
The law enforcement hoax was not the first case of Trump’s tweet in a way that violated the policy explained above via Twitter, whether intentionally or not.
For example, in June 2020, the president shared a video showing a black boy being chased through a white man, the so-called “racist bath,” followed by clips of young people hugging each other. But the fake video: edited and manipulated with a fake news chyron. Twitter called the video, which was no longer visual at the time of writing this article, a “manipulated medium,” as was the forged clip about Biden.
Weeks later, the president perpetrated a large crusade of COVID-19 misinformation by sharing a video with a Texas doctor named Stella Immanuel who stated without evidence that he had treated “hundreds” of COVID-19 patients and that the mask was not obligatory to save him. spread of the virus. (See our Emmanuel survey here, and keep in mind that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that everyone wear a mask when they are close to others during the pandemic. )Social media sites, which added Twitter, removed the video after Trump shared it and had been viewed millions of times.
As for Biden’s manipulated clips, in the absence of an interview with the Trump campaign, the president’s reasons for sharing the clips were unknown.
In theory, however, Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University who studies social media misinformation, told The Washington Post in early 2020 that politicians shared modified videos or misleading fakes (such as Biden’s clip) to verify people’s prejudices.
In other words, the purpose of Biden’s video shared through Trump was not to convince Democrats to vote trump, but to reinforce the ideals among the president’s fans, using Linvill’s theory. the other side, ” he said.
Regarding politicians like Trump who convey misleading content, Becca Lewis, a Stanford University researcher who studies media manipulation, also told the Post:
They convey to an audience that already believes or feels safe about a politician, so when [the fact of manipulation] is revealed, other people don’t care . . . They say ‘this may have been true’ or ‘however, it reflects who the user really is. “In some cases there is a non-unusual form of apathy for the fact that it has been manipulated.
© 1995-2020 by Snopes Media Group Inc.
This curtain can be reproduced without permission.
Snopes and Snopes. com are registered service marks of Snopes. com
Your search didn’t work. Your search terms may want to be reviewed or we haven’t written an article on this topic.
One of the most productive tips for locating articles on our site is to avoid searches that are too long or too fast, so the optimal search strategy is to avoid pasting express words from parts (such as object lines and opening words) into our search. engine and instead focus on choosing a few unique words or names to use as search terms.
If you still can’t locate the item you’re looking for, use our shipping form to send it to us. We can’t communicate about him if we don’t know!
You are in a collection item. See the entire collection.