Joe BidenJoe BidenBiden leads Trump through 8 issues nationwide: Ivanka Trump survey raises millions in a week for Father’s On The Money campaign: McConnell says Congress will approve stimulus package in early 2021 Lawmakers see better prospects for COVID deal after elections MORE’s plan to replace climate and environmental justice attacks China with fossil fuel financing. If the United States wants China’s energy financing abroad to be greener, it will have to compete by providing attractive financing for cleaner alternatives, such as solar and wind power.
China’s energy financing abroad has had a significant effect on the progression of power around the world. According to Boston University’s Global Development Policy Center, Chinese political banks provided $251 billion in energy financing outside China between 2000 and 2019. $26 billion financed in coal and $88 billion in oil.
China’s energy footprint will play a decisive role in accelerating or mitigating climate change. Emerging economies that rely on Chinese finance to satisfy their desires for developing investment have few alternatives, given their low credit ratings. For example, Pakistan’s plans to increase its electricity generation capacity is largely financed through China.
However, Chinese policies are not the main explanation for why investing in coal, oil and gas. Our studies of the Sustainable Energy Policy Initiative (ISEP) show that Chinese allocation developers and public political banks are primarily interested in business progression in recipient countries, with little interest in fossil fuels in particular. China’s energy financing is opportunistic and not strategic in nature. China is in a position to finance a wide range of allocations, provided that the allocation developer is a Chinese company.
If recipient countries, from Bangladesh to Pakistan, made the decision to abandon coal, China would remain in its leadership. Recipient countries are still building coal-fired power plants because they don’t have enough delight or mature market mechanisms to reduce carbon Coal-based power generation is exciting just because Chinese borrowers don’t revel in cleaner alternatives.
For the next U. S. administration, a correct diagnosis of fossil fuel bias in China’s energy financing is essential. would have little effect overall, as other financiers would interfere to meet demand. Instead, the next president of the United States will have to focus on the recipient countries.
To curb the structure of the fossil fuel infrastructure, the United States offers concessional financing for softer alternatives. Profitability is the highest vital criterion for power generation plans in emerging countries. Progression financing establishments may be offering low interest rates for blank energy projects, adding renewable energy, and adhering to the highest environmental standards.
The U. S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) has not been able to do so. But it’s not the first time It is well placed to provide concessional financing for blank energy projects. Founded in 2019 by the merger of the U. S. Agency’s Private Investment Corporation abroad and the U. S. Agency’s Development Credit Authority. But it’s not the first time For International Development (USAID), DFC has extensive experience in financing personal sector projects in emerging countries and has a lending capacity of up to $60 billion. With these resources, the CFL can finance green energy where it matters most.
The United States also deserves to invest in the environmental regulatory capacity of recipient countries. Chinese energy allocation developers face increasingly stringent environmental criteria when building in China, but face few restrictions when building abroad. If Chinese borrowers had more capacity to assess environmental impacts, fossil fuels would be much less economically attractive.
In the future, this type of capacity building deserves to be a key precedent for USAID. Investments in energy, from coal-fired power plants to hydroelectric dams, can be very detrimental to nature and local communities. force investment towards clean, sustainable and resilient alternatives.
These measures would force China to green its criteria and drive the progression of low-carbon power in emerging markets. Today, China’s external financing is being used to mitigate the great oversupply in the country. If recipient countries began to hold Chinese allocation developers accountable, they would move away from fossil fuels and blank energy. This dynamic would benefit recipient countries, China and the United States. A habitable planet is in everyone’s interest.
The United States wants to address the fossil fuel bias by financing China’s power abroad, but policy will have to be based on a correct diagnosis of the problem. Improving environmental criteria in recipient countries and financing blank opportunities can help finance and repair the world’s energy in a green way. USA Weather Leadership
Johannes Urpelainen is the director and professor Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz in energy, resources and at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. He is also the founding director of the Sustainable Energy Policy Initiative (ISEP). Follow him on Twitter @jurpelai.
Look at the thread.
The Hill 1625 K Street, NW Suite 900 Washington DC 20006202-628-8500 phone 202-628-8503 fax
The content of this is © 2020 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp. , a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.