Just over a week after the U. S. election, Twitter presented a summary of some of its efforts to tag misleading tweets. The site reports that from October 27 to November 11, it tagged some 300,000 tweets as a component of its civic integrity policy. 0. 2% of the total number of tweets similar to the elections sent this two-week period.
Of course, not all Twitter warnings are the same. Only 456 of them included a text-covered warning and limited user engagement, disabling retweets, responses, and likes. This express caution led to limited participation, about three-quarters of which Tweets found to see the texts obscured (by clicking on the precaution). Quote tweets for those ranked as well have decreased by approximately 29%, according to Twitter figures.
The president of the United States has earned a disproportionate number of those labels, as the New York Times noted that just over a third of Trump’s tweets between November 3 and 6 won such a warning. the election really ended, I suppose) turns out to have slowed down the site’s reaction time a bit, he continues to report on Trump as he continues to devote the priority of his flow to challenging the election results shown. through almost every one and every primary means outlet.
His last tweet at the time of writing was called disputed, but not hidden, as Trump reiterates his accusations against voting device manufacturer Dominion. “We must also be very transparent in the sense that our paintings are not finished,” Vijaya Gadde wrote. , head of legal, political and accepted affairs as true for sure, and Kayvon Beykpour, product manager. “Our paintings here continue and our groups are learning and improving the way we face these challenges. “
Classified YouTube ads from the “Trump Won” video, but does not remove them as a result of a backlash
Twitter and other social media sites were under scrutiny after the 2016 elections for the role platforms played in disinformation dissemination. Twitter has tried to address the factor by adjusting recommendations and retweets, as well as tagging tweets that violate its policies.
Earlier in the day, YouTube defended its resolve to hold debatable election-related videos, noting, “Like other companies, we allow those videos, because discussion about the effects of elections and the vote counting procedure are allowed on YouTube. These videos are not streamed, or in any way. “