Republican lawmakers in Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin said they would not interfere with the variety of voters, who in the end voted to secure a candidate’s victory; such a resolution would violate state law and the popular vote, several noted.
“I don’t see, unless you locate some kind of fraud – which I haven’t heard of – I don’t see us seriously targeting a voter replacement,” Rusty Bowers said, the Republican president said he flooded with emails asking the legislature to intervene. “They are required by law to decide according to the vote of the people. “
The concept vaguely implies that GOP-controlled legislatures reject Biden’s popular votes in their states and decide to decide on Trump voters. While the end of the game is unclear, it turns out to conclude in the hope that a conservative Supreme Court will do so. any dispute over the move.
However, he has been promoted through Trump’s allies, adding Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, and is an example of misrepresentations and deceptions fueling skepticism among Trump supporters about the integrity of the vote.
The theory is based on the fact that the U. S. Constitution gives state legislatures strength over how the electorate is selected. Each state has already passed legislation that delegates this force to the electorate and nominates the electorate for the candidate who will win the state on Election Day. The only option for a state legislature to care about the electorate is a provision of federal law that authorizes it if the actual election “fails. “
If the election result was not transparent in mid-December, to date the electorate’s nomination, Republican-controlled legislatures in the states in question can simply claim that Trump has won and appoint electorate whom he or the theory says.
The problem, legal experts point out, is that the final results of the election are not clear at all. Biden won each and every state involved. It’s hard to say that the election “failed” when Trump’s own Department of Homeland Security said they hadn’t been forged and were “the safest in American history. “There have been no widespread discoveries of fraud or unrest in the vote count, biden appearing to lead Trump with more than five million votes nationwide.
The crusade of Trump and his allies have filed a lawsuit to withhold certification and possibly provide evidence of election failure, but so far, Trump and Republicans have been unlucky: at least 10 of the lawsuits have been ignored by the courts in the 10 days since the maximum remaining is to ask the courts to prevent Michigan and Pennsylvania from certifying Biden as the winner of their elections.
But legal experts say the courts will eventually prevent those states from appointing the electorate before the December deadline.
“It would take maximum judicial and unjustified intervention that this country has ever noticed,” Danielle Lang said of the Campaign Legal Center. “I haven’t noticed anything in any of those demands that has any merit, let alone enough to delay the nomination of voters. “
Even if Trump wins a legal battle between singles, there is some other potential obstacle: Congress may be the final arbiter for accepting lists of challenged voters, under the Electoral Counting Act of 1887, the law describing the process. The controlled house and the GOP-controlled Senate may simply disagree on which electorate to accept, and if there is no vote or winner, the presidency would pass to the next user in the line of succession at the end of Trump and at the end of Vice President Mike Pence on January 20. That would be the president of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat.
“If it’s a strategy, I don’t think it’s going to succeed,” said Edward Foley, a professor of constitutional law at Ohio State University. “I think we’re in the realm of fantasy. “
But unfounded accusations of fraud and corruption have been circulating widely in conservative circles since Biden won the election. When asked this week whether state lawmakers invalidate official results, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said, “Everything is on the table. “
DeSantis suggested that the citizens of Pennsylvania and Michigan call state legislators and urge them to intervene. “According to article 2 of the Constitution, the presidential electorate is elected through the legislatures and the projects they create and the framework. And if they def from that, if they don’t comply with the law, if they forget the law, they may also be offering remedies,” he said.
Republican lawmakers, however, seem to remain stable. ” The Pennsylvania General Assembly does not participate in or participate in the election of the state’s presidential electorate or in the decision of the final results of the presidential election,” wrote Senator Jake, one of the leading Republican legislative leaders. Corman and Republican Kerry Benninghoff, in an October editorial, their offices said Friday that they were supporting the statement.
Wisconsin House Republican Leader Robin Vos has long rejected the idea, and his spokesman, Kit Beyer, said he was defending that position on Thursday.
In Michigan, legislative leaders say any intervention would be contrary to state law. Although the GOP-controlled legislature is investigating the election, Senate majority leader Mike Shirkey told WJR radio station Friday: “We hope our investigation will result in a replacement in the outcome. “
———
Associated Press editors Scott Bauer in Madison, Wisconsin, David Eggert in Lansing, Michigan, Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Alanna Durkin Richer in Boston and Deb Riechmann in Washington contributed to the report.
24/7 policy of the latest news and events