A leading company oriented to virtual transformation.
President Donald Trump consulted last week with key advisers on the possible features of an army attack on Iran’s main nuclear site, the New York Times reported Monday.
In the end, senior advisers discouraged Trump from continuing the strike, arguing that such a move could become a broader confrontation with little time left in the president’s term, 4 existing and former officials told The Times. and grant, President-elect Joe Biden defeated him in the 2020 election.
Among those who persuaded Trump not to go ahead with the strike were Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller, and Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark A. Mr. Milley.
“Fortunately, cooler heads prevailed,” Nader Hashemi, director of the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Denver, told Insider Nader Hashemi. “An attack by the anti-Iran army would deeply destabilize an already volatile Middle East, with domino effects on the region. especially in Iraq and Lebanon. “
In addition, “Iran has enough enriched uranium to make a bomb,” Hashemi said. “There is no imminent risk that justifies an army attack. “
The White House did not respond to Insider’s request for comment.
The Oval Office assembly came just days after Trump fired Defense Secretary Mark Esper, and a day after foreign inspectors reported a significant build-up of Iran’s uranium reserves.
Iran’s arsenal of low-grade uranium is now more than 12 times the limit set in the 2015 nuclear deal, which Trump controversially withdrew from the United States in May 2018.
Trump’s resolve to withdraw america from the Obama-era nuclear deal temporarily increased tensions between Washington and Tehran, catalyzing a series of skirmishes in the Persian Gulf. sensible general, Qassem Soleimani, while in Iraq.
Soleimani’s attack brought the United States and Iran to the breaking point of the war. Iran retaliated with a missile attack on U. S. forces in Iraq that left dozens of serious injuries. The United States and Iran have avoided a wider confrontation after soleimani’s attack, but tensions remained high and the attack also led Iran to abandon the 2015 nuclear deal altogether.
“The only explanation for why Iran did not need to climb beyond symbolic attacks at the time is exactly because it feared that the United States would be further accentuated through domestic coups in the country,” Hassan Hassan, director of the non-state and geopolitical actor program. at the Global Policy Center, he told Insider. “If the United States moves internally in Iran and opposes nuclear facilities, then the gloves are removed.