A trial under the Espionage Act opposed to Julian Assange is just a First Amendment attack. It’s a cruise missile opposed to a loose internet, and Bitcoin may be next.
I never thought my older brother Julian Assange would want my help.
I’ve admired him. It is fearless, intelligent, concerned and protective No matter what is happening in your world, whether you are traveling the world in search of innovative publications, living under space arrest with an ankle bracelet or seeking asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy, you may simply pay attention to my disorders and offer inaccurate (sometimes unsolicited) advice. When I needed it, he figured out a way to be there for me.
In August 2019, I went to see Julian at HM Criminal in Belmarsh and learned that everything had changed. After years of what United Nations officials have officially described as mental torture or “contactless torture,” the effect on him is more visual than ever. I learned that now it’s my turn to help my brother.
We talked about things like the ubiquitous reaction to COVID-19, when our father was going to slow down and the distraction and consequences of QAnon, however, one of his favorite Bitcoin and cryptocurrency themes.
WikiLeaks and Bitcoin were born from the cypherpunk movement, and it was in embryonic days of the Cypherpunks mailing list that Julian began his interest and intellectual interest in Bitcoin. Julian has participated in discussions and discussions that have cemented the values of cypherpunk. movement around freedom, privacy, the dominance of generation and codified interest. Most of Bitcoin’s supposed creators and early sponsors were owned or encouraged through this network of DIY thinkers and fans.
In 2010, after publishing document increases on the Bush and Obama eras in Iraq and Afghanistan, compromise regulations, archives of detainees in Guantanamo Bay, and U. S. diplomatic cables, WikiLeaks focused on an extralegal foreign banking blockade. and Mastercard refused to process donations and banks and PayPal WikiLeaks and Julian accounts were closed.
It was in those cases that Satoshi (whatever they were) asked WikiLeaks not to settle for this nascent virtual currency for donations and thus give up any attention he could attract. Satoshi feared that Bitcoin would not do so if the protocol was subjected to the same scrutiny. and the political tension faced by WikiLeaks. Julian and WikiLeaks responded to Satoshi’s calls.
After giving Bitcoin six months to strengthen, WikiLeaks has become the first major organization to adopt Bitcoin in June 2011. This alignment has noticed that Bitcoin realizes that the component of its founding precept is a monetary tool, free of political and centralized institutions. WikiLeaks has used its bitcoin donations to defend against attacks and blockages, whether illegal or legal, through governments and companies to succeed over extralegal banking blockade and keep their files online, continue to publish and remain resistant to censorship.
Meanwhile, it has also spoken out to protect Bitcoin as opposed to scams like Craig S’s attempts. Wright impersonating Satoshi by forging signatures and virtual documents. I wonder, if Julian was on the loose today, what he’d have to say about Wright’s newest. efforts to use the courts that oppose Bitcoin developers or how it would combat GAFI visitor knowledge sharing regulations or FinCEN’s recommendation on the disclosure of cryptographic assets abroad.
Bitcoin and WikiLeaks are inherently anti-establishment. Both projects ask us to change our religion in other people and establishments and, on the other hand, depend on verified public information, on the basis that a more informed population creates a freer and fairer society; has defended those who share these ideals. “”as Satoshi called them, they should not take down Bitcoin or WikiLeaks. However, they used other equipment at their disposal. A decade of individual reputation attacks, plots to poison Julian and target his newborn, procedural abuse to limit his movements and speech.
In April 2019, my brother was arrested for violating bail and fees under the US Espionage Act. But it’s not the first time From 1917, although he served the maximum sentence of 50 weeks on bail and effectively won his extradition case before the Uk Magistrates’ Court on 4 January 2021, a day later. Bitcoin’s 12th birthday: Julian is now locked up in the belmarsh suburban prison in London for two years, separated from her fiancé and two young men because of a global pandemic.
The British justice of the peace rejected the extradition request only because of Julian’s history of clinical depression and the excessive situations of detention in the United States that he would face in the event of extradition, and concluded that his extradition would amount to prescribing the death penalty. A few days later, he denied bail and is now awaiting an appeal hearing before the UK High Court.
On all other issues of the law, Julian lost. To be sure, this has sent a chilling signal to the press in the UK and around the world: if it publishes truthful data anywhere in the world on wars, mass surveillance or political corruption that the US does. But it’s not the first time The government needs us to know, so it may be extradite to deal with tariffs on American soil.
Publishers around the world will now have to take into account what they publish and the fact that their publisher or hounds can also be charged under the Espionage Act, as Julian did. This risk is an explanation of why we have noticed the editorial departments of many. Major news agencies expressed their rejection of Julian’s demands and consensus between the Lax press and human rights organizations around the world, calling for an end to these prosecutions.
But it’s not just hounds and editors who are in trouble; those who don’t get advantages from the coverage of media corporations (bloggers, podcasters, YouTubers) are all on the record. More worryingly for Bitcoiners, the extradition treaties that were included in The Position following 9/11 to facilitate the extradition of terrorists to the United States are now being used against technologists who oppose American interests, such as Autonomy’s Mike Lynch in the UK or Huawei’s Meng Wanzhou in Canada. , the fight isn’t over yet.
The US appeal of the US and its allies in the Middle East has been a But it’s not the first time It can be heard through the UK High Court from May 2021. Another rejection of extradition through the Superior Court will be heard loud and transparent through the US Department of Justice. But it’s not the first time And it will be a rejection of censorship, regulation and illegal immigrants. . Julian’s attacks over the more than 10 years.
Bitcoin and WikiLeaks are the utilities of a flexible Internet. They are for it to expand and thrive significantly, both born of the cypherpunk movement, Bitcoin and WikiLeaks have remained true to their visions of decentralization and transparency, the strength of the cryptocurrency network has grown exponentially, this force is accompanied by the duty to protect Bitcoin’s basic ideals from imminent institutionalization.
I hope that rational technologists who have placed big bets on the status quo will combine to see the price of protecting one of their brothers and their own cypherpunk roots. As it did in 2011 when it followed WikiLeaks, Bitcoin has another opportunity to show its steel to the world. A victory by Julian Assange will show the surges of interests of corporations and regulators that the cryptocurrency network is in a position to use its strength to protect what it believes.
Julian Assange’s prosecution can be stopped, but we want your help. An undeniable way to do anything is to give away as many bitcoins as you can through our portal to the link below. Our purpose is to gather 40 bitcoins to pay for the call and related campaign. Donations are completely legal/tax deductible and are made through the German non-profit Wau Holland Foundation.
Donate here: supportassange. wauland. de
This is a guest message through Gabriel Shipton. The reviews expressed are entirely yours and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.