Trump’s vindictive incoherence will have to be fully understood to be believed

Excerpts from his speeches do justice to Trump’s collection of vendettas, inconsistencies and comparisons to prominent figures.

So far, Donald Trump’s speeches in the 2024 election crusade have focused on a long list of grievances, many of them personal, and an increasingly threatening tone.

On those days he does less campaigning than in previous cycles, and less than you’d expect from a guy with committed superfans who brags about the length of his crowds at every chance he gets. But when he organizes rallies, he speaks of immigrants in grim and dehumanizing terms, vowing to defeat those who cross the border. He complains about the legal battles he faces and the fact that they are a sign that he is winning. He lies and invents fictions. He sees his opponent as a risk to democracy and says this election could be his last.

Trump’s tone, as many have noted, is decidedly more vindictive this time around, as he seeks to regain the White House after a fatal loss that he says was a robbery. This fact alone is troubling, as it foreshadows what may happen with the reshuffling of Trump’s presidency. it just seems. But he’s also often rambling and incoherent, going off on tangents that would make headlines for their weirdness if some other candidate said them.

Journalists rightly chose not to broadcast all of Trump’s speeches after 2016, believing that lax politics helped energize the former president and spread rampant lies. But it is now conceivable that accounts of his speeches occasionally make his concepts seem more convincing than they are, arguing that this time, however, people would have to listen to his full speeches to understand how Trump would govern again.

Watching a Trump speech in its entirety best shows what you see in your head: a collection of lies, personal and personal vendettas, common comparisons to other prominent people, a few handfuls of political ideas, and many non-sequences. that become unintelligible stories.

Interestingly, Trump inserts the more tangible policy implications at the end. His speeches end with a glimpse of what his second term might bring, in a meditation-style recitation that the New York Times recently likened to a sermon. come true, here are some of those ideas:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *