Trump’s management revoked a questionable directive Wednesday that ordered a freeze on federal aid programs, after widespread confusion and a partial break ordered through the Court of the Balayage Tribilier.
The Trump administration released a one-sentence memo Wednesday that told agencies the directive has been revoked, according to multiple reports, though White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the freeze itself was still in place, and only the initial memo ordering the directives had been rescinded to “end any confusion.”
The moratorium on transience, admitted in a wonderful check and budget, secured on Monday through independent journalist Marisa Kabas, ordered a pause in all federal aid, “including but not limited to” similar to diversity, foreign aid and the “ideology of awakening. “
The memorandum did not specify what subsidies would be reduced and not reduced, and several reports have reported that it can end up stopping practically all federal subsidy programs, it stopped with a massive government budget, even though the White House said on Tuesday that the pause only The dosel expenses that can contain the recent executive decorations of Trump about issues such as diversity and energy.
A few minutes before the break that will enter into force at five p. m.
The rupture not implemented in social security and physical conditioning insurance invoices or “financial aid directly provided to people” and the OMB can grant other exceptions on a case case foundation. “
Agencies were asked to read what systems collide with Trump’s executive orders to avoid government spending that falls under “financial aid for foreign aid, non -governmental organizations, Dei, aroused gender ideology and the new green agreement,” according to THE MEMO.
All federal agencies have also been guilty of appointing “a senior politician” to monitor spending “so that that federal monetary assistance is in line with the administration’s priorities. “
3 billion dollars. This is how the federal government spent help the 2024 monetary year, the memorandum would have declared, although it is not transparent where the figure comes from.
A federal judge in Rhode Island granted a request on Wednesday from a group of state attorneys generals seeking a restraining order barring the directive from taking effect. A day earlier, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. granted a temporary injunction while legal challenges wind their way through court. The first injunction was issued in response to a lawsuit filed by four advocacy groups—the National Council of Nonprofits, the American Public Health Association, the Main Street Alliance for small businesses and the LGBTQ advocacy nonprofit SAGE—against the OMB and Acting Director Matthew Vaeth. That lawsuit argues the OMB memo violates provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act prohibiting actions that are “arbitrary and capricious” and “in excess of statutory authority.” It also accuses the administration of violating the First Amendment by targeting “recipients of federal funding” who have expressed “viewpoints disfavored by the administration.”
The scope of the rest is not transparent because the language of the order can be interpreted largely as implemented for a wide diversity of financing systems through education, medical research, infrastructure systems, loans to small businesses, homes And more. The subsidies that were granted but that were not spent also presented to rest, according to Associated Press. The White House directives published Tuesday later, who sought to explain the effect indicated that the rest was implemented in particular to Trump’s executive decrees about immigration, foreign aid, power and the environment, abortion and Transgender disorders, a much narrower set. of subsidies. Senator Patty Murray, D-Wash. , The most productive Democrat of the Senate Credit Committee, indexing dozens of systems that can be assigned to a note from Democrats in the Senate received through Puck News, adding subsidies to save violence Against women. and victims, financed through the public shipping projects of the federal government and subsidies to help firefighters, police and state veterans.
Federal Pell grants and direct loans are not impacted, the OMB told reporters, citing the provision in the order stating that financial assistance to “individuals” is exempt. The agency is still requesting a review of the programs pursuant to Trump’s other executive orders, however, USA Today reporter Zach Schermele wrote on X, citing OMB instructions.
No. Leavitt said “Social Security, Medicare, food stamps, welfare” and “assistance that is going directly to individuals will not be impacted.” The guidance said funds for small businesses, the Head Start child care program, rental assistance and “other similar programs” would remain in effect. Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said on X he didn’t believe the White House’s claims that Head Start wouldn’t be impacted, claiming the program has been impacted in Connecticut.
The White House said in its guidance issued publicly later Tuesday that Medicaid “will continue without pause.” However, Medicaid portals went down in all 50 states on Tuesday. While Leavitt insisted no payments have been affected and said the portal would be “back online shortly,” Democratic senators attributed it to the funding freeze. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., called the move “a blatant attempt to rip away health insurance from millions of Americans overnight” that “will get people killed.” The White House did not say why the portal was down.
Trump last week ordered a separate, 90-day freeze on “foreign development assistance” pending a foreign policy review. A second, more sweeping order issued later in the week by the State Department, also halts foreign aid grants for 90 days, according to multiple reports. Military assistance for Israel and Egypt and emergency food aid is exempt from the freeze, the Wall Street Journal reported. The U.S. Agency for International Development put dozens of officials suspected of actions “designed to circumvent the President’s Executive Orders” on leave, according to multiple reports. The directive appears to apply to weapons assistance for Taiwan and Ukraine and mandates stop-work orders for nongovernmental organizations and aid groups to prohibit them from spending U.S. aid that’s already been distributed, the Journal reported.
Legal actions against the order are likely to argue Trump can’t pause funding that’s already been approved by Congress. The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 requires presidents to submit requests to Congress to halt federal funding that has already been appropriated but not yet spent, though Trump has argued for years the law is unconstitutional, a stance echoed by his OMB Director nominee Russell Vought during his Senate confirmation hearing. Some legal experts suggested Monday Trump’s order violated the law, even if it’s only temporary and the paused funding ends up being distributed. If legal challenges arise and are elevated to the Supreme Court, it could issue a ruling within weeks. The Supreme Court ruled against former President Richard Nixon’s use of impoundment to withhold water treatment funding for New York City, but the court paused the Impoundment Control Act while the case was playing out. Despite the high court being controlled 6-3 by conservatives, Georgetown University law professor Stephen Vladeck predicted the justices could determine Trump’s directives could usurp congressional authority. The Trump administration said in its Tuesday guidance the pauses were “not an impoundment under the Impoundment Control Act.”
The memo created widespread alarm and confusion among Democrats and entities that rely on federal financial assistance. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., cast doubt on the legality of the order, writing on X that “Congress approved these investments and they are not optional, they are the law.” Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., questioned whether it meant cancer trials at the National Institutes of Health would be put on hold. Murray and Rep. Rose DeLauro, D-Conn., predicted “far-reaching consequences” in a letter to Vaeth.
Trump’s Executive Orders: Here Are All His Big Day-One Actions On Immigration, Energy, TikTok And More (Forbes)
Trump Expected To Sign Executive Orders Banning DEI, Transgender Service Members From Military (Forbes)
Trump’s Diversity Orders Rattle CEOs: What Companies Should Know About New DEI Rules (Forbes)
One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts.
Our network is to attach other people through open and thoughtful conversations. We need our readers to make their revisions and exchange concepts and facts in one space.
To do so, please abide by the posting regulations in our site’s terms of use. We’ve summarized some of those key regulations below. In other words, keep it civil.
Your message will be rejected if we realize that it turns out to contain:
The user accounts will block if we realize or that users are compromised:
So, how can you be a power user?
Thanks for reading our network directives. Read the complete list of publication regulations discovered the situations of use of our site.