House Speaker Mike Johnson subsidized President Donald Trump on Wednesday, a day after he announced the U. S. is “taking over” the Gaza Strip and stirred controversy for calling for the relocation of Palestinians from the war-torn enclave, even as the White House says U. S. troops have not committed to the effort.
February 5, 2 p. m. Estjohnson described the proposal of “Bold Movement” and said he did nothing in the Gaza Strip, would leave doors open to terrorist organizations to “eliminate Israel as a state. ” He asked other people to “retain the trial” until the announcement of a more formal plan.
Feb. 5, 1:30 p. m. Estwite House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the Gaza President’s plan had not been expanded and was “written from Gaza as he revealed to the global. “She said that “the president did not dedicate himself to putting boots on the floor in Gaza” and said that any of the Palestinians in the region, which was in comparison to ethnic cleansing, would be temporary.
“The president obviously said they deserve to be temporarily moved from Gaza for the reconstruction of this effort,” Leavitt said. “Again, it’s a demolition site right now. It is not a living position for a human being. And I think it’s pretty bad to recommend that other people deserve to live in disastrous situations as well.
Feb. 5, 1:30 p.m. ESTSecretary of State Marco Rubio made comments suggesting Trump was proposing to help clear out and rebuild the area, not take ownership: “The only thing President Trump has done — very generously, in my view — is offer the United States’ willingness to step in, clear the debris, clean the place up from all the destruction… so that then people can move back in,” Rubio said.
Rubio also tweeted “Make Gaza Beautiful Again.”
Feb. 5, 12:30 p.m. ESTIsrael announced that it would withdraw from its participation in the U.N. Human Rights Council.
February 5, 12 noon, United Nations Hnele spokesman, Stéphane Durric, did not directly comment on Trump’s plan, but said that “any forced displacement of other people is to ethnic cleaning. “
February 5 at 8 a. m. The National Security Advisor of Estrump, Mike Waltz, told Fox Business that the president’s plan to displace the citizens of the Gaza Strip is a step in the reconstruction procedure and that management has asked the leaders of the Region of the proposal: “We have: We talk with the Saudi, we talk to the Egyptians, we talk to the Jordanos, he said.
February 5, 7:30 a. m. , Essen. Rand Paul, Republican of Ky. , Said that the United States had “no company” occupying the Gaza Strip, and added that “I idea that we had voted for the first time in the United States. “
February 5, 7:30 a. m. , the president of Eastern Palestine, Mahmoud Abbas, asked the United Nations to interfere with “protecting the other Palestinian people and their inalienable rights” and said that Trump’s plan would be “a serious violation of foreign law “.
On February 5 at 7:30 a. m. , Eastbadr Abdelatty, the foreign minister of Egypt, one of the countries that Trump presented as a site for the resettlement of Palestinians, raised the issue of other people with Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammed Mustafa and said Cairo was impatient with Palestinian Authority Palestinian Authority Muhammad Mustafa and said that the Cairo impatient Palestinian Authority “assumes its purposes in the Gaza Strip within the framework of the occupied Palestinian territories. “
While Abdelatty’s statement didn’t directly address Trump’s remarks, he expressed his country’s support for the “legitimate and inalienable rights of the Palestinian people” and called for the establishment of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.
February 5, 6:30 a. m. Faced with foreign condemnation, Trump’s proposal has been extracted from the extreme right -wing members of the Israel ruling coalition government. The country’s finance minister Bezalel Smotrich praised the proposal as the “real response” to October. 7 Attack on Israel and added that “those guilty for the horrible bloodbath in our land will face their own permanent loss. “
February 5, 5:30 a. m. , the key allies of the United States of Estseveral, adding the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Australia, also rejected the suggestion of relocating the Palestinians while reaffirming their solution of two states.
Speaking at a press convention in kyiv on Wednesday, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the United Kingdom, David Lammy, said: “We have been transparent in our conviction that we will have to see two states. We will have to see the Palestinians live and prosper in His country of origin in Gaza and the West Bank.
The French Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying it opposes “any forced displacement of the Palestinian population of Gaza, which would constitute a serious violation of international law, an attack on the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinians.”
The statement added that France will “continue to push for the implementation of the two-state solution, the only thing that can guarantee long-term peace and security for Israelis and Palestinians.”
The Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said his country “supports, bipartisanly, a solution of two states in the Middle East”, but stopped commenting directly to Trump’s comments saying: “I said before I don’t have the intention to have a continuous comment about the president of statements of the United States. “
German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said: “A displacement of the Palestinian civilian population from Gaza would not just be unacceptable and against international law. This would also lead to new suffering and new hatred…There must be no solution over the heads of the Palestinians.”
February 5, 5:00 a. m. , Turbish Oriental Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan rejected Trump’s proposal saying that any plan to move Palestinians out of Gaza is “unacceptable” and even that such a thing is an “incorrect” matrix
On February 5 at 4:30 a. m. , in addition, the newspaper of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China on Wednesday, the spokesman for Lin, Jian, said: “We oppose forced displacement and the relocation of the population to Gaza and we hope that all parties participate take the cessation.
February 5 at 4:10 a. m. Esthusin Al-Sheikh, the general secretary of the Palestine Liberation Organization (considered through many as the successor of the president of the Palestinian authority Mahmoud Abbas) pointed to X that the Palestinian control “AFCompanys of his company that the solution of the Two of the State, in accordance with legitimacy and law, is the guarantee of security, stability and peace.
The press release added that the Palestinian leadership rejected “all calls for the displacement of the other Palestinians from their homeland. We were born here, we live here, and we will stay here. “
February 5 at 4:00 a. m. of the Eastern Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a rejected “any violation of the valid rights of the other Palestinians, either through Israeli Agreement policies, land annexation or attempt to displace the other Palestinian people of their people from their people land “.
The statement added that the Saudi government’s position “UnshakableArray. . . is not negotiable or an issue for compromises” and said that the country’s de facto head, Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman, under pressure that Saudi Arabia does not identify diplomatic relations with Israel without the status quo of an “independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. “
February 5, 3:15 am, Prime Minister of Estscotland, John Swinney, said that the relocation of Gaza Palestinians to other countries, as advised through Trump, would be equivalent to “cleaning ethnic”, the first politician to do a such a declaration. There is no express definition of ethnic cleaning under the United Nations, the organization refers to a report describing it as “a targeted policy designed through an ethnic or devout organization to be removed through violent and inspiring terrorism means the population civilian from ethnic or devout organization of sure geographic areas. »»
February 4, 8:00 p. m. Estrump said “we’ll have it” discussion of Gaza’s long execution and reported that the U. S. can remove the still active bombs in the region, “level the siege” and “create an economic progression that will provide an unlimited number of jobs and housing” for “other people in the region,” but we don’t know what he meant by other people.
The president also said that Gaza “does not pass through a procedure of reconstruction and profession through the same people,” suggesting that Palestinians in Gaza be transferred to other countries.
The president, who made the comments at a press conference along Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, adding that the United States would take a “long-term asset position” from Gaza, did not respond to a query about the legal position. Allow the United States to take control of the region.
Get alerts of Breaking Forbes text messages: we are launching SMS alerts to know the greatest stories that shape the titles of the day. “Alert” text in (201) 335-0739 or log in here.
Trump’s comments came just a few hours after he told reporters at the White House that Palestinians should be resettled in Jordan, Egypt or other countries and referred to Gaza as a “demolition site” (Jordan and Egypt have rejected the idea of Palestinian resettlement from Gaza). Trump did not provide finer details about his proposed “economic development” in Gaza and did not clarify who would benefit from the “unlimited numbers of jobs” he claimed it will produce.
Paul O’Brien, the executive director at Amnesty International US, tweeted that: “Removing all Palestinians from Gaza is tantamount to destroying them as a people. Gaza is their home. Gaza’s death & destruction is a result of the gov of Israel killing civilians by the thousands, often with US bombs.” Council on American-Islamic Relations’ National Executive Director Nihad Awad said: “If the Palestinian people were ever somehow forcibly expelled from Gaza, this crime against humanity would complete the Israeli genocide of the Palestinians on their own land, spark widespread conflict, put the final nail in the coffin of international law, and permanently scar our nation’s international image.”
“I think the potential in the Gaza Strip is unbelievable,” Trump said of the region’s future, calling it the “riviera of the Middle East.”
Trump did not rule out sending American troops to Gaza when asked about the possibility. “If it’s necessary, we’ll do that—we’re going to take over,” he said.
Jared Kushner, Trump’s son and former senior adviser, said last year in the Gaza Clash that the region’s local assets “could be very precious, if other people focus on creating livelihoods. “
Trump said Gaza “is not a place for people to be living” and referenced the widespread destruction in the region without directly addressing Israel’s military campaign there. The president has proposed Palestinian resettlement in nearby countries, though Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar have resisted plans to move refugees out of Gaza. The five countries have instead pushed for a two-state solution including the establishment of a Palestinian state. In addition to Gaza, Trump has proposed making places such as Greenland, the Panama Canal and Canada a part of the U.S.
Trump calls Gaza the ‘demolition site’, gives the Palestinians of restart to meet with Netanyahu (Forbes)
The Israeli approves the high Gaza’s fire and the hostage (Forbes)
A community. Many voices. Create a lazy account to pry your thoughts.
Our network is about connecting other people through open and considered conversations. We need our readers to prove their reviews and exchange concepts and made in a space.
To do this, please stick to the publication regulations the situations of use of our site. We have summarized some of those key regulations below. In other words, stay it civil.
Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:
User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:
So, how can you be a power user?
Thank you for reading our community standards. Please read the complete list of publication regulations found in the terms of use of our site.